The International Ergonomics Association (IEA) defines cognitive ergonomics as being “concerned with mental processes, such as perception, memory, reasoning, and motor response, as they affect interactions among humans and other elements of a system.” Relevant topics in this area include mental workload, decision-making, skilled performance, human-computer interaction, human reliability, work stress and training as these may relate to human-system design.
Biomechanics and work physiology are disciplines within the field of Physical Ergonomics which IEA defines as being “concerned with human anatomical, anthropometric, physiological and biomechanical characteristics as they relate to physical activity.” The form of biomechanics practiced in the Center for Ergonomics is consistent with what is commonly referred to as “Functional Biomechanics”. It was defined by Frankel and Nordin (1980) as using “laws of physics and engineering concepts to describe motion undergone by the various body segments, and the forces acting on these body parts during normal daily activities.”
Research at the Center for Ergonomics is concerned also with the development of frameworks, methods, and models for analyzing and preventing mishaps and complex system failures in a variety of domains. Using a systems approach and/or epidemiology, we examine the contribution of cognitive/perceptual, technological, and organizational factors to incidents and accidents. The overall goal of this work is to develop tools that help prevent and manage erroneous actions by end users as well as increase resilience and create a safety culture at all levels of an organization.
2020
Du, Na and Zhou, Feng and Pulver, Elizabeth and Tilbury, Dawn and Robert, Lionel and Pradhan, Anuj and Yang, Jessie, Examining the Effects of Emotional Valence and Arousal on Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving (January 12, 2020).
2020
Du, Na & Tilbury, Dawn & Robert, Lionel & Zhou, Feng & Pradhan, Anuj & Pulver, Elizabeth & Yang, X. Jessie. (2020). Predicting Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving.
2020
Georgarakis, A.M., Sonar, H.A., Rinderknecht, M.D., Popp, W.L., Duarte, J.E., Lambercy, O., Paik, J., Martin, B.J., Riener, R., and Klamroth-Marganska, V. “Age-dependent asymmetry of wrist position sense is not influenced by stochastic tactile stimulation.” Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2020.
2020
Kostyniuk, Lidia P., and Clive R. D’souza. “Effect of Passenger Encumbrance and Mobility Aid Use on Dwell Time Variability in Low-Floor Transit Vehicles.” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 132, 2020, pp. 872–881.
2020
Lim, Sol, and Clive D’souza. “A Narrative Review on Contemporary and Emerging Uses of Inertial Sensing in Occupational Ergonomics.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 76, 2020, p. 102937.
2020
Manary, M.A., Flannagan, C.A., Reed, M.P., Orton, N.R., and Klinich, K.D. “Effects of Child Restraint Misuse on Dynamic Performance.” Traffic Injury Prevention, 20:8. 860-865, 2020.
Education
Continuing Education
We are providing instruction and development to professional ergonomists, engineers, and designers in private industry through a variety of continuing education courses. Custom course development is another service offered by the Center for Ergonomics. Please contact us to discuss your needs. Recent courses have included Ergonomic Principles for Workplace Assessment and Design, Updates in Occupational Health Nursing, and Comprehensive Industrial Hygiene Review.
Outreach & Service
The 3D Static Strength Prediction Program™ software predicts static strength requirements for tasks such as lifts, presses, pushes, and pulls. The program provides an approximate job simulation that includes posture data, force parameters and male/female anthropometry. Output includes the percentage of men and women who have the strength to perform the described job, spinal compression forces, and data comparisons to NIOSH guidelines. The user can analyze torso twists and bends and make complex hand force entries. Analysis is aided by an automatic posture generation feature and three dimensional human graphic illustrations. 3D SSPP software can be used as an aid in the evaluation of the physical demands of a prescribed job. Furthermore, the 3D SSPP can aid the analyst in evaluating proposed workplace designs and redesigns prior to the actual construction or reconstruction of the workplace or task. The program is applicable to worker motions in three dimensional space.